How will HB 4 improve testing for Texas kids?

Date Posted: 5/07/2025 | Author: Tricia Cave
House Bill (HB) 4 by Chairman Brad Buckley (R–Salado) has been voted out of committee and will be headed to the House floor soon. The bill would substantially overhaul Texas’s testing and accountability system.
Key changes to testing
The revised version of HB 4 overhauls the testing system by switching to a nationally norm-referenced test and creating short, through-year tests that more accurately measure student growth. These changes would provide educators with timely feedback in order to help inform instruction. Here’s a side-by-side comparison of the current STAAR system and the HB 4 proposal:
STAAR | HB 4 Proposal | |
---|---|---|
Type of test | Criterion-referenced (measures a student's performance against a predetermined standard or set of criteria [the TEKS], rather than against the performance of other students) | Nationally norm-referenced (compares a student's performance to the performance of others in a specific group, such as a class, school, or even a national group) |
When tested? | Annually in grades 3-8 as well as in high school end-of-course (EOC) exams for Algebra I, English I, English II, U.S. History, and Biology | Three short online tests at beginning, middle, and end of year |
Test Length | Four or five hours, depending on the test (high school EOCs are five hours) | Designed to be 60-90 minutes per test |
Campus shutdown required? | Yes | No |
Scoring turnaround | Takes weeks. Test results are not available until after the end of the school year. | Within 24 hours |
Learning integration | None. (Data is from former students and useless once received.) | Teachers can use data from the beginning or mid-year test to inform instruction and target areas where students need more depth. |
How many tests? | Math and Reading/Language Arts in grades 3-8 Science in grades 5, 8 Social studies in grade 8 High school EOCs: English I, English II, Algebra I, Biology, US History |
Reduced to federally mandated minimums No more social studies No more English II |
Key changes to A-F accountability system
The bill would additionally reform the A-F accountability system by doing the following:
- Allowing for a better representation of student growth by taking into account the results from all three tests administered to a student throughout the year.
- Allowing districts to opt in to additional performance indicators in order to better demonstrate student success. These optional indicators can include things such as locally developed assessments and other indicators, including student work portfolios or postsecondary readiness indicators.
- Requiring a quicker turnaround of scoring data. This increases transparency, as well as allows districts more time to analyze their data and potentially challenge any inaccuracies.
- Permitting the commissioner of education to revise the accountability framework only once every five years.
ATPE opposed the original version of HB 4 but supports the current version. We have also asked for the punitive pieces of the A-F accountability system, such as district takeovers, to be paused for three to five years in order to allow districts to make adjustments to the new system.
CONVERSATION
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

05/28/2025
Deadlines and dying bills and the promise of sine die
While many Texans were enjoying a long weekend, the Texas Legislature continued to work ahead of this week's end-of-session deadlines.

05/23/2025
Teach the Vote’s Week in Review: May 23, 2025
House and Senate leadership move forward with a major school finance deal in CSHB 2. Plus, find out what’s happening at the federal level with charter schools, budget reconciliation, and the Department of Education.

05/23/2025
Federal Roundup: Supreme Court decision on charter schools, budget reconciliation update, and more
A deadlocked Supreme Court blocked the State of Oklahoma from using taxpayer dollars to run a religious charter school.
I like getting rid of the STAAR, but I am skeptical of the new tests. The problem is that the GW Bush model of test and punish is what also needs to change. Otherwise, we continue with the same bad system and only add a new kind of test.
I think that this would be a great improvement!