/getmedia/b45c2c5c-0d84-4757-b6a3-f57137019a5e/4-0-texas-state-capitol-building-PAB36DR-1903x776_repositioned-1.jpg?width=1903&height=776&ext=.jpg /getmedia/b45c2c5c-0d84-4757-b6a3-f57137019a5e/4-0-texas-state-capitol-building-PAB36DR-1903x776_repositioned-1.jpg?width=1903&height=776&ext=.jpg

Texas Senate unanimously passes SB 26 to increase pay for some teachers

Teach the Vote
Teach the Vote

Date Posted: 2/27/2025 | Author: Mark Wiggins

The Texas Senate unanimously passed a bill Wednesday that would increase pay for some classroom teachers along with a number of other provisions. 

The upper chamber approved Senate Bill (SB) 26, which includes a tiered raise based on district size and teacher years of service. The $4.3 billion bill would also expand the Teacher Incentive Allotment (TIA) performance pay program while removing guarantees of future pay raises. The bill does not include raises for other educators, including counselors, school nurses, librarians, classroom aides, and other support staff. 

As sent to the House, the SB 26 pay raise would: 

  • Create a Teacher Retention Allotment (TRA) that provides money to districts for teacher pay increases for the next two years based on the size of the district’s student population and the experience of the teacher. Districts with 5,000 students or fewer would receive TRA funds to provide an additional $5,000 for teachers with three to five years of experience and $10,000 for those with five or more years of experience. Districts with 5,000-plus students would receive $2,500 for teachers with three to five years of experience and $5,500 for those with more than five years. 
  • Repeal the automatic pay raise language placed into law as part of 2019’s House Bill (HB) 3, which requires that 30% of any overall increase in school funding be spend on increasing teacher compensation any time the Legislature increases the Basic Allotment. 
  • Introduce a new bottom rung of TIA designations, “acknowledged,” associated with a $3,000 stipend, and increase existing stipends. 

As passed out of committee, SB 26 would have removed National Board Certification as a TIA qualifier entirely. The bill’s author, Senate Education K-16 Committee Chairman Brandon Creighton (R–Conroe), submitted a handful of floor amendments, including one that would allow National Board Certified-educators to retain their designation under the Teacher Incentive Allotment (TIA) until the shorter of the expiration of their certification or three years. SB 26 removes National Board Certification as a qualifying criteria for TIA designations moving forward. 

Another amendment by Creighton requires a district to first be approved as a TIA district before it can qualify to become an “enhanced” TIA district and draw an additional 10% funding weight under SB 26. 

Sen. Jose Menendez (D–San Antonio) successfully submitted an amendment to include special education, bilingual education, and fine arts teachers in TIA programs. 

ATPE submitted proposed amendment language to Creighton: 

  • The first was intended to address educators’ concerns over the permanence of the pay raise attached to the creation of the TRA. As SB 26 is currently drafted, the Legislature can stop future funding for the TRA without repealing any statutory language by simply failing to fund the provision. It is very common for the Legislature to simply stop funding a program without repealing it. The amendment would have required TRA raises to continue regardless of future appropriations unless the Legislature affirmatively passed a new bill to repeal the raise.  
  • The other amendment would have redirected funding in the bill aimed at creating a new state bureaucracy for the purpose of providing undefined educator liability protection from a single vendor selected by the Texas Education Agency (TEA). ATPE’s amendment would have simply provided educators with that funding directly for the purpose of voluntarily acquiring liability insurance. Although ATPE is one of dozens, or more, providers of educator professional liability insurance—some nonprofit like ATPE and others for profit—the submitted amendment was not specific to ATPE and would have directed this liability insurance funding to flow directly to teachers to purchase any qualified liability insurance policy from any provider at the educator’s discretion.  

Chairman Creighton declined to entertain either of ATPE’s proposed amendment to his bill. SB 26 now heads to the Texas House. ATPE thanks the nearly 2,000 educators who used ATPE’s Advocacy Central to contact their senators with feedback on SB 26. 


CONVERSATION

7 Comments

Earline Jackson
03/03/2025

I am disappointed in our governor showing more compassion for the rich and wealthy, than for the middle class where we are being taxed heavier and given less. He and his elected President are favoring the wealthy. He wants vouchers for people capable of paying their own tuitions but, ripping off public education to help fund country club private and charter schools. His partner is doing everything to dismantle Social Security and Medicare and the people thought he genuinely cared to reduce the inflation. You have been dupped and hoodwink by both of them. Watch how Public Schools are going to suffer irregardless of what you are being told and sold. Watch inflation run rampant, and you social services squandered away before your very eyes. After having said all of that, those are some of the reasons they are not interested in what you do and could care less how much give to the schools.in support. Their hearts are not for you or with you. Some of you voted for both of them, and they are going to ride into the sunset and leave you behind.


Karen Fuller
03/03/2025

Support staff is essential to all schools. Who’s going to do scheduling, counseling, check on the sick, cook meals for the students, clean the cafeteria, clean the kitchen, clean the classrooms, or clean the restrooms. Without the support staff the school would be a hot mess. This bill needs to be reviewed again and make an huge adjustment to include a substantial pay increase to support staff as well because we are very significant to the running of the school too. Billions of dollars and you act as if we are taking money out of individual pockets. Abbott has held on to billions of dollars just because he is strictly focused on school vouchers. Shame on him and all the greedy legislators who don’t care for all educators like they should. Maybe holding on to federal funds for personal gain or because things aren’t going your way is the reason why other nations are ahead of us. Thinking out loud! We are all an integral part of the puzzle……


Eddie Hill
03/02/2025

How can we leave out our support staff members? I know how hard they work, and they deserve recognition and higher pay. Schools are not just made up of teachers. Anyone that works with our students is an educator!


Valerie Orr
03/01/2025

Indeed, counselors and all support staff keep our schools running efficiently and and our students safe and cared for. The legislature has fallen into a pattern of only looking at teachers (who are definitely worthy) and not looking at the countless others that a district will not be able to afford to give raises to. Also, having been a Special Educator for 36 years, the rubrics to determine if my students were making the progress necessary for increased pay was a joke. I occasionally got a stipend because it was difficult to get a special educator, but not for how my students improved (which they did.))


Julie Cruz
03/01/2025

Clerks, IA’s, & support staff are crucial to teacher & students success! We do 3 -4 people’s jobs with hourly pay less than $19. We deserve pay increases too!


Meme
03/01/2025

Why are Counselors not included??


Shannon Hullum
02/28/2025

This pay raise sounds like a bait and switch. State fund the raise temporarily and then the burden falls on the district to fund it.


Thank you for submitting your comment.
Oops, an unexpected error occurred! Please refresh the page and try again.

RECOMMENDED FOR YOU