Competing priorities for public education
Date Posted: 10/21/2016 | Author: Monty Exter
Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick held a press conference yesterday to lay out his priorities for the 85th Legislative Session. To no one's surprise, those priorities were heavily centered on the privatization of public education and the defunding of neighborhood schools through passage of the latest voucher fad. Certainly, there are many priorities the state can and should address to improve the way we meet our constitutional obligation to make available a system of free public schools to the state's roughly 6 million school-aged children, but vouchers are not one of them. In addition to costing the state potentially billions of dollars, the consensus of the research finds that voucher programs don’t, in any uniform or significant way, increase educational outcomes for the students who use them. Additionally, despite voucher proponents' claims to the contrary, the research does not find any competition-driven boost to the public system. The competitive effect that can be observed is a diversion of money from the classroom into marketing budgets. Instead of continuing to focus on this perennial distraction on behalf of those few but influential interests who stand to gain from the privatization of our public schools, the lieutenant governor and the legislature should work on behalf of all students and parents to address the state's real educational priories. To highlight a few, they could:
- address the preparation, retention, and equitable distribution of classroom educators, the single most influential factor on a child’s educational attainment;
- address the stress-inducing drill-and-kill environment in many of our struggling schools created by the state accountability system, which makes it virtually impossible for these children to learn according to neuroscience;
- address the state’s continuing struggle to attain universal, full-day, and high-quality prekindergarten; and
- address our flawed system of school finance; address its inadequate weights for low-socioeconomic groups, English language learners, and special education populations; address the layer upon layer of inefficient and inequitable "hold harmless" provisions.
CONVERSATION
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU
02/06/2026
Teach the Vote’s Week in Review: Feb. 6, 2026
A special election runoff in Texas Senate (SD) 9 results in a dramatic party flip in a Republican stronghold.
02/06/2026
Congress finally unveils long-awaited education budget after another brief government shutdown
Texas schools are receiving short-term stability in key federal supports but no new fiscal capacity to address growing student needs, staffing challenges, or service mandates.
02/05/2026
How does the first round of Senate interim charges relate to public education?
Senate Finance will study lowering the homestead exemption age from 65 to 55, and Senate Education will study the influence of federal or state-designated hostile agents or their surrogates on public schools.