Competing priorities for public education

Date Posted: 10/21/2016 | Author: Monty Exter
Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick held a press conference yesterday to lay out his priorities for the 85th Legislative Session. To no one's surprise, those priorities were heavily centered on the privatization of public education and the defunding of neighborhood schools through passage of the latest voucher fad. Certainly, there are many priorities the state can and should address to improve the way we meet our constitutional obligation to make available a system of free public schools to the state's roughly 6 million school-aged children, but vouchers are not one of them. In addition to costing the state potentially billions of dollars, the consensus of the research finds that voucher programs don’t, in any uniform or significant way, increase educational outcomes for the students who use them. Additionally, despite voucher proponents' claims to the contrary, the research does not find any competition-driven boost to the public system. The competitive effect that can be observed is a diversion of money from the classroom into marketing budgets. Instead of continuing to focus on this perennial distraction on behalf of those few but influential interests who stand to gain from the privatization of our public schools, the lieutenant governor and the legislature should work on behalf of all students and parents to address the state's real educational priories. To highlight a few, they could:
- address the preparation, retention, and equitable distribution of classroom educators, the single most influential factor on a child’s educational attainment;
- address the stress-inducing drill-and-kill environment in many of our struggling schools created by the state accountability system, which makes it virtually impossible for these children to learn according to neuroscience;
- address the state’s continuing struggle to attain universal, full-day, and high-quality prekindergarten; and
- address our flawed system of school finance; address its inadequate weights for low-socioeconomic groups, English language learners, and special education populations; address the layer upon layer of inefficient and inequitable "hold harmless" provisions.
CONVERSATION
RECOMMENDED FOR YOU

04/02/2025
House Public Education Committee postpones vote on school finance, vouchers to Thursday
Educators have additional time to use ATPE’s Advocacy Central to share their thoughts on these critical issues.

04/02/2025
Senate Education K-16 Committee hearing goes late into the night
ATPE weighed in on several bills heard during the committee’s April 1 hearing.

04/02/2025
ATPE testifies in opposition to payroll deduction bill in Senate hearing
Watch testimony from Dr. Shannon Holmes, Past State President Jayne Serna, and member Lena Angel.